The thought of development is just a provocative one, a linear plot we've informed ourselves for centuries, a tale of ascent from the black caves of superstition to the gleaming spires of reason, from the challenging battle for survival to the curated comfort of contemporary living, a journey marked by the steady accumulation of information, the taming of organic allows, and the ever-expanding circle of individual sympathy and rights, a course that, despite their unexpected stumbles and detours, certainly points upward toward a brighter, more prosperous, and more enlightened future for most of humanity, but imagine if this story, for several its soothing quality, is fundamentally flawed, a grand dream stitched from the strings of selective storage and scientific triumphalism that obscures a more complicated,
more unclear, and possibly even more troubling reality, a reality in which our greatest developments are inextricably linked to new kinds of peril, our solutions provide beginning to book problems, and our liberation from old burdens imposes its own, subtler kinds of confinement, making us to face the disconcerting possibility that development is not a direct range but a control, or possibly even a severe party, where every step forward can also be, in certain essential and frequently unanticipated way, an action sideways as well as backward into a set of problems we lacked the creativity to predict? Think about the monumental step of the Agricultural Innovation, that foundational change which allowed our hunter-gatherer ancestors to be in, to create villages that could become villages and then cities, to keep surplus food which allowed specialization, offering rise to the artist, the scribe, the priest,
and the master, thus sleeping the foundation for all following civilization, artwork, research, and tradition as we realize it, an unequivocal advance in the individual saga, and however this really move, as thinkers from Rousseau to modern anthropologists have stated, also planted the seeds of social stratification, of entrenched inequality where for the first time some men could collect wealth and energy around the others, it resulted in the concept of personal house and with it, area disputes and conflicts of a range unimaginable to nomadic rings, it condensed populations into unclean settlements that turned reproduction reasons for crisis diseases like smallpox and measles, disorders that leaped from the 오피스타 animals we now existed in close closeness to, and it often led to a less varied and nutritious diet, resulting in health problems like dental decay and
iron-deficiency anemia which were less common among foraging people, so we must question, was this development a pure good, or was it a devil's bargain, a deal where we received the possibility of tradition and difficulty at the cost of introducing endemic inequality, widespread struggle, and book kinds of suffering? The exact same paradoxical pattern repeats with dizzying reliability through the duration of history, take the Industrial Revolution, that good motor of transformation which began in the wet coal-fields of England and spread across the world, unleashing prodigious effective energy, creating unprecedented wealth, filling the planet with marvels of executive and comfort, from railways that shrank contin